Why Your so-called government doesn’t do what you want it to do.
1). Colin Powell -- Secretary of State, ex-chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, of Jamaican origin, he has one Jewish ancestor on his father's side. He grew up in a heavily Jewish-populated neighborhood in New York, and speaks Yiddish. The first day of being picked (12/16) he said he wanted to toughen sanctions on Iraq, and will work to "re-energize the sanctions regime."
2). Richard Perle -- One of Bush's Foreign Policy Advisors. He is chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board. He had worked as Bush's Jewish national security campaign advisor. A very likely Israeli agent, Perle was expelled from Senator Henry Jackson's office in the 1970's after the National Security Agency (NSA) caught him passing Highly-Classified (National Security) documents to the Israeli Embassy. He later worked for the Israeli weapons firm, Soltam.
3). Paul Wolfowitz -- Deputy Defense Secretary, Bush's Jewish foreign policy campaign advisor, close associate of Israeli agent Richard Perle, and reportedly has close ties to the Israeli military.
4). Robert Satloff -- U.S. National Security Council Advisor, Satloff was the executive director of the Israeli lobby's "think tank," Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Many of the Israeli lobby's "experts" come from this front group, like Martin Indyk.
5). Dov Zekheim -- Under Secretary of Defense and Comptroller. He was Bush's Jewish foreign policy advisor and reportedly holds Israeli citizenship.
6). Douglas Feith -- Under Secretary of Defense and Policy Advisor at the Pentagon. He is a close associate of Perle and served as his Special Counsel. Like Perle and the others, Feith is a pro-Israel extremist, who has advocated anti-Arab policies in the past. He is closely associated with the extremist group, the Zionist Organization of America, which even attacks Jews that don't agree with its extremist views. Feith frequently speaks at ZOA conferences. Feith runs a small law firm, Feith and Zell, which only has one International office, in Israel. The majority of their legal work is representing Israeli interests. His firm's own website stated, prior to his appointment, that Feith "represents Israeli Armaments Manufacturer." Feith basically represents the Israeli War Machine.
7). Elliott Abrams -- National Security Council Advisor. He previously worked at Washington-based "Think Tank" Ethics and Public Policy Center. During the Reagan Adminstration, Abrams was the Assistant Secretary of State, handling, for the most part, Latin American affairs. He played an important role in the Iran-Contra Scandal, which involved illegally selling U.S. weapons to Iran to fight Iraq, and illegally funding the contra rebels fighting to overthrow Nicaragua's Sandinista government. He also actively deceived three congressional committees about his involvement and thereby faced felony charges based on his testimony. Abrams pled guilty in 1991 to two misdemeanors and was sentenced to a year's probation and 100 hours of community service. A year later, former President Bush (Senior) granted Abrams a full pardon. He was one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the Reagan Administration's State Department.
8). Marc Grossman -- Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. He was Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources at the Department of State. Grossman is one of many of the Jewish officials from the Clinton Administration that Bush has promoted to higher posts.
9). Richard Haass -- Director of Policy Planning at the State Department and Ambassador at large. He is also Director of National Security Programs and Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). He was one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the first Bush (Sr) Administration who sat on the National Security Council, and who consistently advocates bombing Iraq.
10). Henry Kissinger -- One of many Pentagon Advisors, Kissinger sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board. For detailed information about Kissinger's evil past, read Seymour Hersch's book. Kissinger had a part in the Watergate crimes, Southeast Asia mass murders, Chile dictatorship, and more recently served as Serbian dictator Slobodan Milosevic's Advisor. He consistently advocates bombing Iraq. Kissinger is the Ariel Sharon of the U.S.
11). James Schlesinger -- One of many Pentagon Advisors, Schlesinger also sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor. He consistently advocates bombing Iraq.
12). Robert Zoellick -- U.S. Trade Representative, a cabinet-level position. He is also one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the Bush (Jr) Administration who advocated invading Iraq and occupying a portion of the country in order to set up setting up a Vichy-style puppet government. He consistently advocates bombing Iraq.
13). Mel Sembler -- President of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. A Prominent Jewish Republican and Former National Finance Chairman of the Republican National Committee. The Export-Import Bank facilitates trade relationships between U.S. businesses and foreign countries, specifically those with financial problems.
14). Ari Fleischer -- Official White House Spokesman for the Bush (Jr) Administration. Prominent in the Jewish community, he reportedly holds Israeli citizenship.
15). Joshua Bolten----Bush's Chief Policy Director, banker and former legislative aide, prominent in the Jewish community.
16). Steve Goldsmith -- Senior Advisor to the President, and Bush's Jewish domestic policy advisor. He also serves as liaison in the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives (White House OFBCI) within the Executive Office of the President. He was the former mayor of Indianapolis. He is also friends with Israeli Jerusalem Mayor Ehud Olmert and often visits Israel to coach mayors on privatization initiatives.
17). Adam Goldman -- White House's Special Liaison to the Jewish Community.
18). Joseph Gildenhorn -- Bush Campaign's Special Liaison to the Jewish Community. He was the DC finance chairman for the Bush campaign, as well as campaign coordinator, and former ambassador to Switzerland.
19). Christopher Gersten -- Former Executive Director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, Husband of Labor Secretary, Linda Chavez, and reportedly very pro- Israel. Their children are being raised Jewish.
20). Daniel Saul Goldin -- Head of NASA, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. A leftover from the Clinton Administration, Golding is frequently praised by the Israeli media as a friend of Israel.
21). Mark Weinberger -- Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
22). Samuel Bodman -- Deputy Secretary of Commerce. He was the Chairman and CEO of Cabot Corporation in Boston, Massachusetts.
23). Bonnie Cohen -- Under Secretary of State for Management.
24). Ruth Davis -- Director of Foreign Service Institute, who reports to the Office of Under Secretary for Management. This Office is responsible for training all Department of State staff (including ambassadors).
25). Lincoln Bloomfield -- Assistant Secretary of State for Political Military Affairs.
26). Jay Lefkowitz -- General Counsel of the Office of Budget and Management.
27). David Frum -- White House speech writer.
Now that Bush has hired these pro-Israel Jewish lobbyists to the highest positions in the land, has escalated the bombing of Iraq, and already sided with Israel in killing Palestinian civilians, it is obvious that the price of the acheiving the White House involves selling out to the Israeli lobby, much like Clinton, before him.
Contributed by an Associate
How do you fool a White American Conservative? You promise him everything he wants to hear, ally with his enemies, and then run around in failed campaign after campaign. Frankly, I must say that I am surprised at the level of positive responses of support for such a "pillar of working class White America" and a "Washington outsider" such as Buchanan. Excuse me, I digress, Buchanan is a millionaire and comes from a high class family, although by the image he likes to create you might think otherwise. A Washington outsider? Buchanan's politics and attitude never left the beltway of Washington D.C. and cannot and will not exemplify any hope for normal working White Americans more than any Warren Beatty limousine liberal type. His recent alliance with the Black Neo Marxist and ultra feminist, Fulani, conveys his eternal allegiance to Washington politics. Where Marxist style Socialism is the cup of tea of any liberal degenerate.
An old acquaintance of mine, a very aged and learned man of numerous activities in politics for the Democratic Party and Marxist interests such as the CPUSA, used to laugh at the rhetoric of Buchanan. My acquaintance had followed Buchanan's career closely from his association with "Tricky Dick" Nixon all the way to his numerous failed campaign efforts at President. Buchanan is about as an outsider to Washington politics as the Kennedy clan is and a laughing stock for the Marxists and their liberal goons. If his political alliance was with Bill Clinton would we think otherwise? I am sure we would. I could imagine the disgust we would hear if Pat Buchanan enjoyed a nationwide political tour with hammer and sickler Gus Hall for the Reform Party. Oh my! But a Black Neo Marxist is okee dokee. Has Buchanan really addressed the hard issues of White survival and self responsibility? Has Buchanan really ever exposed the true face of Washington D.C. politics and fought for a solution to these problems? Has Buchanan ever exposed to the light of day the contributions from corporation interests, Jewish interests, and otherwise interests that would scare away his mass support of working men and farmers? And is it apparent to any White Nationalist that Buchanan has many Jews working for him in all levels of his campaign? Of course not. Remember, Buchanan's career is being a POLITICIAN. Taking away his lifeblood's of being a American political clown would take away his bourgeois lifestyle that he happens to keep under wraps for the viewing public. To anyone's knowledge it is apparent that Buchanan has not even worked a day in his life in any job worthy enough for him to speak to the white working masses as one of their own.
His political policies are either Conservative claptrap or fantasy stories. Like his comment on building a wall from the tip of Southern Texas to the edge of California to keep the illegal immigrants out. This kind of fantasy jargon keeps the reality deficient Conservative American cheering. But having been a longtime resident of the American Southwest this kind of rhetoric is obvious boob lobbying. The problem of illegal immigration is simply a convenient way for American Corporations to import cheap labor coolies and devalue the work of the white laboring man. Buchanan receives his token reward from American corporative interests whether he's a Republican or a member of the billionaire plutocrat and poisoned dwarf Perot faction. His token remarks on Israel's special lobbying power on Capital Hill does nothing to hide the fact that he has spoken highly of the Israeli state and of its need to remain the dominant power in the Middle East. A very strategic location which keeps the Israeli state at the gateway of three continents: Africa, Europe, and Asia. Of course we need to keep those "filthy ragheads and camel jockeys" in check. The ONLY people to continue an all out fight against World Zionist interests and the policies of Washington D.C. are a shocking embarrassment to any White Conservative. If we are going to support any effort by those who do not speak for White Nationalist causes, then at least focus support for Arab freedom fighters, not two faced politicians who would rather take their 30 shekels then get their hands a little dirty.
In Rhodesia and South Africa there were multitudes of conservatives and more radical racial types who came out in full support for their politicians. These politicians, mind you, all broke under the pressure of Washington beltway types and gave their people over to mass slaughter by, who else, Black Neo Marxists. George Wallace, the pillar of 60's Southern Nationalism, was nothing more than an old morally corrupt hot air balloon whose clown like antics fooled the newest descendant of the Do Do Bird, the White American Conservative. This applies to any Barry Goldwater, Robert "the Welcher" Welch, Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich, who style themselves a teeny bit more Right than the rest of the Republican and Conservative lemmings. And how about Joseph McCarthy who exposed numerous Communist agents in all levels of the Federal government? His political career was managed and eventually run into the ground by the vast numbers of Jews who got a little too antsy at the fact that his unearthing of Communist agents was bringing too may Marxist Jews into the spotlight. To see large amounts of White Nationalists come out in support for such an obvious Establishment tool like Pat Buchanan is to say nothing of the lack of revolutionary zeal and true commitment we owe to our people's survival on this planet. As of today there is absolutely no Great White Hope in any significant position of public or political life, nor is there any with a significant following. To quote the Irish Nationalists it must be "Ourselves Alone." We must reserve any energy, financial power, and words of support for OUR STRUGGLE. Not for the struggle of an obvious liar and morally corrupt weakling. Buchanan, the eternal Capitalist, and Fulani, the eternal Marxist, join forces in the oldest allegiance of the world. While the vast majority of conservatives and misguided racists cheerfully play the tune of the Wedding March. our focus, is to take back our future and dignity. To secure a white homeland in North America and aid in the liberation of white Europe from her enemies within and without. Anything and anyone else does not focus in the perimeter of our struggle. Our Race is Our Nation!
WAR Positions on WAR fever
The Conservative War-Mania August 8, 2002
by Joe Sobran
Why do so many conservatives -- most of whom oppose abortion, the killing of human fetuses -- so readily, even eagerly, favor war? Not just this or that war, but nearly every war?
The idea of war seems to conjure in their imaginations a picture of a battle between a virtuous America and a purely evil enemy who deserves whatever he gets. In World War II movies, for instance, German soldiers are always shown as cruel, usually beefy men, more than 30 years old, each of whom is capable of strangling Ann Frank with his bare hands. They are never shown as scared kids, drafted like our boys to fight for purposes they don't understand.
Even Steven Spielberg's SAVING PRIVATE RYAN, so realistic in its depiction of the violence of war, maintained this stereotype. All the Germans! were rotten adult Nazis, in contrast to the fresh-faced, morally sensitive American boys who wrote home to Mom. In the movies, German soldiers never seem to have moms.
Yet the memoirs of veterans like Paul Fussell are full of touching stories of the enemy's humanity. Fussell recalls looking at the bodies of dead Germans after one battle and finding not the hardened men he expected to see, but teenaged boys who probably didn't shave yet. He realized that war is tragedy, not melodrama.
Today we have become inured to depictions of Arabs as swarthy, unshaven fanatics, also momless. This has prepared us psychologically for the coming war with Iraq. Who ever heard of a scared Arab kid, sent by his government to fight and die? We're told that Saddam Hussein is a ruthless tyrant, which he surely is; yet we're expected to believe, too, that his armies are composed of his willing servitors rather than his victims.
And what about civilians? In modern war, civilians women, children, old people -- always die. Some children who survive lose limbs. We have a phrase for this: "collateral damage." Given its inevitability, we should at least hesitate before resorting to war. Yet conservatives can't wait for the bombing to start. They view war not as a regrettable necessity, but as a positive good, the prospect of which elates them.
Feticide is wrong because killing the innocent is wrong. War kills indiscriminately. Conservatives used to have deep reservations about war. Why are this generation's conservatives so different from their ancestors? Their casual acceptance of war is one of the most striking cultural changes in American life. Conservatives usually oppose wasteful spending programs, yet war is the most wasteful spending program of all. Enormous amounts of wealth are diverted from production to destruction. Is it worth it? Will the costs of devastating Iraq be justified by any gains? Would peace be more costly than ! war? The Bush administration is avoiding these basic questions, and conservatives aren't demanding answers.
Recall one of our recent wars: the war on Panama. The overthrow of Manuel Noriega was supposed to disrupt the illicit drug traffic in Latin America. It didn't. In terms of its announced purpose, that easy victory totally failed.
Will the easy defeat of Iraq destroy terrorism? The idea is absurd. It will provoke even more terrorism, and Americans around the world -- including us in America itself -- will be in greater danger than before. Everyone knows it. The Bush people don't even deny it. And conservatives don't seem to care. War is the one government program they assume will succeed. Their talk shows, magazines, and newspapers clamor for war. Their think-tanks ask no skeptical questions, issue no cost-benefit analyses. The same people who ridicule liberal welfare programs for "throwing money at the problem" are willing to take exactly t! he same approach to terrorism. And the liberal programs at least aren't meant to kill people.
Fussell's masterpiece WARTIME puts great stress on the sheer inefficiency of war. War always begins with optimistic talk about "precision bombing" and "surgical strikes" that will quickly vanquish the enemy. But armies and air forces are unwieldy things, and people are hard to kill when they don't want to be killed. So the material costs of warfare always far exceed the expected costs. Nor does victory bring the expected results. Conservatives rightly lament the "unanticipated consequences" of welfare programs, but they don't seem to notice the unanticipated consequences of war. If they want a cost-benefit analysis, they might start by reading Aeschylus and Euripides.